Vitamin C, Whole Food Vs. Synthetic: Does It Matter?
Debunking the myth that vitamin C in plants is found in a special "tyrosinase complex."
Many people argue that whole food vitamin C is fundamentally different from ascorbic acid.
Whole food vitamin C is preferable because whole foods provide many important nutrients. However, whole food vitamin C is not something fundamentally different from ascorbic acid.
As an example, Morley Robbins writes in Cu-RE Your Fatigue: The Root Cause and How To Fix It On Your Own (p. 168, 209-210):
Real vitamin C as it occurs in nature (food-based) is like a complete car that has an engine, a steering wheel, four wheels, and a shell. And in that whole food vitamin C-complex, the “engine” is an enzyme called tyrosinase, which is one of the most important copper-based enzymes in our body. . . . Compared to the real vitamin C-complex, ascorbic acid and ascorbate are simply the shell of the car, without the engine, nor any other moving parts. . . . Nor is the tyrosinase enzyme all that synthetic vitamin C is lacking. It also lacks the polyphenols rutin and the flavanone glycoside hesperidin (sometimes referred together as “vitamin P”), vitamin K, and factor J (choline), all of which are found in whole food vitamin C-complex, and, along with tyrosinase, are essential co-factor nutrients that work synergistically with ascorbigen, the natural form of L-ascorbic acid that whole food vitamin C-complex also contains. Without these essential co-factors, L-ascorbic cannot be absorbed, which is why 90 percent of synthetic vitamin C supplements are rapidly excreted by the body soon after they are consumed. That should suffice to prove that the human body does not want synthetic vitamin C!
None of this makes any sense.
In plants, vitamin K is bound in the photosystem complexes as part of the machinery of photosynthesis, and vitamin C is not.
The best plant sources of choline are nuts and seeds, which have among the least vitamin C.
Flavonoids universally have low absorption and are treated as xenobiotics, like toxins and drugs, to be eliminated from the body. Rutin from onions, for example, is about 7% absorbed and then metabolized.
By contrast, 70-90% of ascorbic acid is absorbed at doses in the hundreds of milligrams and this falls to 50% at doses higher than one gram. Urinary loss of ascorbic acid is minimal until intakes reach 80 milligrams per day, and then increases proportional to the dose thereafter.
The benefits of flavonoids are mediated primarily through the principle of hormesis, which is the principle that a little of something bad for you can be good for you by improving your defenses. The benefits of vitamin C, by contrast, are that it is an essential cofactor for many enzymes and a critical part of the antioxidant system.
Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) cannot possibly be found universally in a complex with tyrosinase.
First, ascorbic acid does not form complexes with enzymes for which it is a cofactor. Some nutrient do. For example, riboflavin is usually present as FAD in a “prosthetic group” that is complexed to the enzyme and would have to be dissociated during digestion. Vitamin C is a soluble redox factor that travels between different enzymes or other substances transferring electrons from one to another.
Second, ascorbic acid is a cofactor for many different enzymes in plants, but not for tyrosinase.
It is a cofactor for ferric chelate reductase, violaxanthin desoxidase, (converts violaxanthin to zeaxanthin, which protects photosystem II from photo-inhibition by dissipating excess excitation energy), l-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase (involved in the synthesis of plant hormone ethylene), ascorbate oxidase (has a role in cell division), ascorbate peroxidase (converts H2O2 to H2O and O2), and monodedydroascorbate reductase, which recycles it.
There is a hypothesized role in synthesis of abscisic acid, gibberellins, and catabolism of auxins.
Ascorbic acid is a direct antioxidant and electron donor to photosystems and the respiratory chain, especially under stressed conditions.
It is ubiquitously found in all plant tissues except seeds that mature in a highly dehydrated state.
Its concentrations correlate mainly with photosynthetic activity.
This paper covers its distribution in plant tissues:
Compartment-Specific Importance of Ascorbate During Environmental Stress in Plants
The highest concentrations are in peroxisomes and cytosol, lowest in vacuoles, and all other organelles are intermediate.
The crystal structure of tyrosinase contains copper, but not vitamin C:
Vitamin C inhibits tyrosinase:
Biological evaluations of novel vitamin C esters as mushroom tyrosinase inhibitors and antioxidants
In Cure Your Fatigue: How balancing 3 minerals and 1 protein is the solution that you're looking for, Robbins cites this paper as showing that ascorbic acid is capable of “breaking down ceruloplasmin”:
What they found was that it could be reduced using vitamin C, which was “completely reversible in the presence of oxygen.”
He cites this study showing that vitamin C can reduce copper and ceruloplasmin in the serum:
Influence of ascorbic acid supplementation on copper status in young adult men
The design of the study is poor, with no proper control. However, it suggests that taking 500 milligrams of vitamin C every day with each of three meals, for a total of 1500 milligrams per day, can decrease serum copper by about 5% and ceruloplasmin by about 25% over two months.
Ascorbic acid can donate electrons, and as such can shift iron and copper into oxidation status such that copper absorption is inhibited and the absorption of plant iron is enhanced.
Ascorbic acid can also shift oxidation states of these minerals inside the body, and this can remove copper from ceruloplasmin and help deliver it to cells, but can interact with overloaded iron by making it more likely to cause oxidative stress.
All of these flow straightforwardly from vitamin C as a reductant, that is, an electron donor, and there is no evidence whatsoever that natural vitamin C from plant or animal foods has a different structure than synthetic ascorbic acid.
One good reason to avoid synthetic ascorbic acid is that it is made from GMO corn and probably contaminated with glyphosate, though you can find non-GMO ascorbate on Amazon.
The main reason to use whole food vitamin C, though, is that no one needs more than 200-400 mg per day except in the cases of sepsis or chemotherapy, and this is easily and affordably gotten from food or from whole food supplements, which contain many other nutrients that have benefits, and it is very likely there is value to having some of them balanced with the vitamin C.
For vitamin C dosing guidelines and balancing concerns, see these two articles:
The Powerful Duo: How Glutathione and Vitamin C IV Drips Impact Cancer
Disclaimer: I am not a medical doctor and this is not medical advice. I have a PhD in Nutritional Sciences. Please do not make any decisions about cancer prevention or treatment on the basis of this article, and if you choose to make such decisions please discuss them with your physician prior to taking any action.
Cancer, IV Drips, and the Glutathione-Vitamin C Connection
I am not a medical doctor and this is not medical advice. Please see the full disclaimer at the bottom. Is high-dose vitamin C good for you? High-dose intravenous vitamin C can selectively kill cancer cells in live patients and can save sepsis patients from dying, but it acts as a pro-oxidant in cancer and an antioxidant in sepsis.
In conclusion, whole food vitamin C is better for most use cases, but this is not because it exists in some kind of special structural complex. It is because most people do not need doses higher than those that can be obtained affordably from whole food supplements, and the whole food supplements contain many other good things in them. I personally use one capsule of Paleovalley whole food vitamin C per day.
Join the Quarterly Question Contest
Have a question for me? Enter the Quarterly Question Contest for a chance to win by popular vote a well researched and presented answer! Learn more here.
Join the Masterpass
Masterpass members get access to premium content (preview the premium posts here), all my ebook guides for free (see the collection of ebook guides here), quarterly question contests (see here), all my courses for free (see the collection here), and exclusive access to massive discounts (see the specific discounts available by clicking here). Upgrade your subscription to include Masterpass membership with this button:
Learn more about the Masterpass here.
Please Show this Post Some Love
Take a Look at the Store
At no extra cost to you, please consider buying products from one of my popular affiliates using these links: Paleovalley, Magic Spoon breakfast cereal, LMNT, Seeking Health, Ancestral Supplements, MASA chips. Find more affiliates here.
For $2.99, you can purchase The Vitamins and Minerals 101 Cliff Notes, a bullet point summary of all the most important things I’ve learned in over 15 years of studying nutrition science.
For $10, you can purchase The Food and Supplement Guide for the Coronavirus, my protocol for prevention and for what to do if you get sick.
For $10, you can purchase Healing From COVID Vaccine Side Effects for yourself or a loved one if dealing with this issue. It also contains an extensive well-referenced scientific review, so you can also use this just to learn more about my research into the COVID vaccines.
For $29.99, you can purchase a copy of my ebook, Testing Nutritional Status: The Ultimate Cheat Sheet, my complete system for managing your nutritional status using dietary analysis, a survey of just under 200 signs and symptoms, and a comprehensive guide to proper interpretation of labwork.
Get on the waitlist for my new Biochemical Optimization Program at bioopthealth.com.
Thank you! What I appreciated about this piece is that it takes a very noisy topic and brings useful biochemical clarity to it. The post does a strong job of separating the idea that whole-food vitamin C may be preferable in practice from the much stronger claim that it is somehow a fundamentally different molecule than ascorbic acid. That distinction is important, and I think you handled it well! I also appreciated the way you challenged the “vitamin C complex” narrative directly rather than simply repeating a more marketable but less rigorous story. It makes the piece feel grounded, intellectually honest, and refreshingly evidence-oriented.
One nuance that could make the piece even stronger is to draw a slightly clearer line between what is well established and what remains more interpretive in the broader discussion around supplement sourcing. The argument against the tyrosinase-complex idea is quite direct, but some of the practical preferences for whole-food supplements over synthetic forms seem to rest partly on broader concerns about co-nutrients, sourcing, and manufacturing context rather than on evidence that vitamin C itself behaves differently once absorbed. Making that hierarchy even more explicit could help readers distinguish chemistry from formulation philosophy.
Overall, I thought this was a sharp and valuable contribution because it encourages readers to think more carefully about mechanism, marketing language, and nutritional context all at once. Very well done!
What several holistic medical people have told me is that the biggest problem with ascorbic acid is that its often produced as a byproduct of an industrial process and it could contain some of the chemical contaminants of that process.