Watch now (138 mins) | Crawford has uncovered what seems to be a smoking gun that someone altered the 2016-2019 data of the DMED database to hide an explosion of ill-defined health problems in 2021.
This is precisely what was done with CDC’s mortality data, as pointed out in the post linked below. To whit, ~2.9M people died in 2020, representing no surge and no excess when compared to previous years. This data was posted weekly through the year. And yet, after the year was complete, approximately 500K deaths were added, initially as part of the final week’s tally, but later distributed throughout the year.
I have not seen or heard this publicized elsewhere.
Thanks for sharing this Chris and seeing the truth. I’m a civilian and my husband is active duty at a Tier One command. We were all mandated to get the jab and finally submitted to the J&J injection and did detox protocols. Luckily neither of suffered anything but flu like symptoms but I was/am horrified by the number of serious issues afflicting the guys around me who are literally some of the fittest men on the planet. Having to wear heart monitors, random infections, exasperated TBI symptoms, it’s insane and heartbreaking what our government has done to force experimental medical treatments on our VOLUNTARY military. The only thing worse is them now pushing the poison on babies. Wolinsky is pure evil.
I had 'it' by Halloween, 2019, and didn't recover until January 2020. At the time I thought it was like a pnuemonia with a whooping cough similarity, but dryer. I was working for a person who has contact with Chinese nationals, at an Acupuncture College in the Pacific Northwest. They were visibly ill with a respiratory thing but they had a house move-out date so I was obligated to be in close contact to help them move for a week. I was angry at the time, glad later, that I had caught such a rough illness.
bonus healing notes -I was down for a month, drank nothing but Burdock root tea (lucky to have a 2# bag of it), a pint a day, for 40 days. No appetite, lost 10% bodyweight. 2 other humans I was near DID NOT even GET IT. And after all that, I recovered at home fine, and managed to avoid the jabs, but the others I live with did get them, and had reactions. And after that, I have been FINE no illness, gained wt back too. Best
At first I have thought, you have revealed to much, but now I see it was actually very good, because it can keep us composed and focused on what really happened instead of deception we were lead to believe.
Most people cannot imagine the world without the three letter agencies. But You are right, they are obviously obsolete.
This is amazingly important. I was doubting whether they use artificial intelligence on us or whether artificial intelligence is using them. This clearly shows this is a man made situation, because that’s how people act when caught while committing a crime, artificial intelligence would not do such as stupid mistake.
The question mark is the most important part of the title of this interview, because way too much qualifying alternative data that conflicts with the general conclusion is presented. He is so incredibly precise that it leaves one wondering if he indeed thinks what he implied as his synopsis initially or not. it is incredibly frustrating to try to translate. i understand wanting to be complete with explaining your findings, but he keeps acknowledging errors in the whistleblower testimony, but then proves that errors were insignificant, or at least could be to the overall case, but then he says also the DoD made errors, and that he DOES believe that it WAS actually a glitch, but to explain, i will get to that later….that kind of thing over and over. I really do appreciate anyone helping to reveal true information during this pandemic, and i think this *data* is revealing, but i think this does not help our efforts at truth coming out, and i do also recognize that he is a researcher and not a writer or a speaker, which is why i would recommend he either ask a writer or a speaker to represent his work, or he consider trimming out some of the qualifying aspects that go against his ultimate synopsis, but also are not truly essential to include. It is about as relatable for me as Aristotle’s Metaphysics, with all its qualifying details. I really mean no offense to Crawford, and i appreciate his work on this data, but this form of interview does not help anyone with anything, thats my two cents.