I am aging at only 2/3 the normal rate!

My first ever DunedinPACE results came in, and show that I am aging at 0.66 the normal rate:

As I pointed out in Biological Age Clocks: Are They Useful?, DunedinPACE is by far the best available aging clock, and should be regarded as “experimental and possibly useful,” which is far more than can be said for the other available clocks.

This is the clock used for Bryan Johnson’s Rejuvenation Olympics. I officially registered and if I make it onto the leaderboard my scores will be public and have my name attached to them.

If I were to maintain three similar results over the course of six months, I would be in first place worldwide on the absolute leaderboard (I can’t believe this, there must be far too few people registered), a hair’s length ahead of Julie Gibson Clark, the famous “55-year-old single mom [who] makes less than $100K per year and is reverse aging without spending millions,” and I would be six places ahead of Bryan Johnson (0.72) and 19 places ahead of Peter Diamandis (0.82) of X-Prize fame.

On the other hand it will be awfully hard for me to rank on the relative change leaderboard since I am coming out of the gate beating everyone else. This score is based on the improvement in the most recent score compared to the average of the first two.

A minimum of three results is needed to get on either leaderboard, and the one I have the best chance of ranking on — the absolute leaderboard — requires three tests be spread across six months.

So, I will complete two more tests and then I will provide a much more detailed analysis of the results, including many auxiliary aging metrics. I will also do some real-world quantification of grip strength, VO2max, and other such metrics to see whether the results are reflecting the realities of my health.