It is a fun article! I love reading about Sulfur, as I became interested in it because I had stopped tolerating it.
Unrelated to the article, but my Sulfur intolerance had no difference with taking molybdenum (I was taking quite a bit, upto 1500 mcg per day). I accidentally discovered that taking CoQ10 helped a 1000% with tolerating Sulfur as well as H2S. What am I missing here? Any thoughts @Chris MasterJohn
You're under the incorrect assumption that the protons aren't causing fusion and fission, because you separate out physics and chemistry as something different. In fact mitochondria have the ability to add and remove protons from the core of atoms; Sodium + proton becomes Magnesium. Potassium + proton becomes Calcium. There also is evidence that oxygen can also be fused so Sodium + Oxygen becomes Potassium, and Magnesium + Oxygen becomes Calcium. This goes against the "standard" model and about 36 other "physics" models, and also goes against "quantum" theory and the invention of the "neutron" back in 1933, and also goes against the Hiesenberg "uncertainty" principle (which is hilarious making a principle of not knowing something). The "neutron" was invented in 1933, there was no need for it, what is considered a neutron is a proton electron pair, there are no neutrons and no need for all the mess that came after it. If you are interested in learning more, please look up this new model called the Structured Atomic Model by Edwin Kaal, he has a website with an atom viewer and also a fantastic book out, that explains in detail the binding energies of simple LENR (low energy nuclear reactions) .. and by low energy it is meant low input energy; the output energy is massive because it is mainly fusion of a proton to the core of atoms to change their types. He also has found over 40 missing atoms from the standard model periodic table.
It is a fun article! I love reading about Sulfur, as I became interested in it because I had stopped tolerating it.
Unrelated to the article, but my Sulfur intolerance had no difference with taking molybdenum (I was taking quite a bit, upto 1500 mcg per day). I accidentally discovered that taking CoQ10 helped a 1000% with tolerating Sulfur as well as H2S. What am I missing here? Any thoughts @Chris MasterJohn
Probably a CoQ10 synthesis defect leading to a secondary deficit in turning molybdenum into its cofactor form.
how does coq10 play a role in turning molybdenum into its cofactor form?
Although CoQ10 synthesis defect would also decrease the clearance of H2S via sulfide quinone reductase.
You mention the sulfur aminos, could a lot of molybdenum create an overgrowth that robs the body of essential methionine ?
What do you mean by overgrowth? Bacteria?
Um, the enzymes that use the molybdenum and consume the sulfur aminos? Or did I misunderstand entirely what you meant..
No, increasing the expression of sulfite oxidase would not create a methionine deficiency.
Thank you so much for this interesting article.
Are you saying using too much CoQ10(or any amount for some people)increase sulfite issues?
That's unlikely and wasn't my point, but is conceivable.
You're under the incorrect assumption that the protons aren't causing fusion and fission, because you separate out physics and chemistry as something different. In fact mitochondria have the ability to add and remove protons from the core of atoms; Sodium + proton becomes Magnesium. Potassium + proton becomes Calcium. There also is evidence that oxygen can also be fused so Sodium + Oxygen becomes Potassium, and Magnesium + Oxygen becomes Calcium. This goes against the "standard" model and about 36 other "physics" models, and also goes against "quantum" theory and the invention of the "neutron" back in 1933, and also goes against the Hiesenberg "uncertainty" principle (which is hilarious making a principle of not knowing something). The "neutron" was invented in 1933, there was no need for it, what is considered a neutron is a proton electron pair, there are no neutrons and no need for all the mess that came after it. If you are interested in learning more, please look up this new model called the Structured Atomic Model by Edwin Kaal, he has a website with an atom viewer and also a fantastic book out, that explains in detail the binding energies of simple LENR (low energy nuclear reactions) .. and by low energy it is meant low input energy; the output energy is massive because it is mainly fusion of a proton to the core of atoms to change their types. He also has found over 40 missing atoms from the standard model periodic table.
Thanks.