How a negative PCR test can serve as a marker for systemic inflammation and spike protein toxicity, creating a widely exploited statistical anomaly to make misleading claims about hospitalization.
Feb 20, 2022·edited Feb 20, 2022Liked by Chris Masterjohn, PhD
Thanks Chris, I've been following your work since 2008. You're an inspiration. May I suggest that anyone fragile enough to die from the vaccine has already been removed from the potential pool of people to die from COVID and this gives an artificial reduction in deaths. Similar to your hypothesis in 2010 for The China Study, you don't die from COVID if you're already dead. Since a death less than 14 days after vaccination is counted as "unvaccinated" this data is hidden from the public. Providing the false appearance that the vaccine reduces mortality.
Great and in depth article Chris. It amazes me that the BMJ picked up the covid-like illnesses right at the beginning in the Pfizer trial, but like so many things it didn't get the attention it deserved. Good to see you on Substack!
Very nice article Chris. It actually answers the question that I asked myself, when I wrote an article based on CDC MMWR study from October, written in October:
Excellent. "COVID-like illness" is a good term because it takes the nonsensical test (and indeed the nonsensical term COVID-19 itself) out of the equation and looks at actual symptoms instead.
This is such amazing work, and I haven't quite gotten to the end of it yet, but may I make a suggestion? In the sections where you analyze the fading efficacy against testing positive in Finland, New York, Israel, etc., consider contrasting it against "hospitalized positive tests" or "positive test hospitalizations" instead of "hospitalizations," just to remain consistent with the rest of the article, and its thesis that actual hospitalizations aren't reduced, but rather, only PCR-positive hospitalizations.
I'm sending you money to support this research. I think it would be very helpful for someone to create a graphic that looks like the ones hospitals were releasing all summer. But instead of having little people graphics representing, say, 10 hospitalized vaccinated people and 90 hospitalized unvaccinated people, all with covid, It will also have 90 hospitalized vaccinated people with covid-like illness who tested negative. And it needs to go viral. You need to send it, and this article, to all the usual juice skeptics with large audiences, but also to Matt Walsh, who can put it directly in front of Ben Shapiro, who is a huge juice fan, but is also very open to evidence. If you can get Shapiro talking about this, you've got an audience of millions, a large percentage of whom actually did get the juice.
I highly recommend interviewing ER doctors about this. I personally know one who would almost certainly be interested in talking to you, if you contact me. If your theory is correct, they should have been seeing juiced covid like illness in substantial numbers that coincided with each surge in the unfused over the past 12 months.
Dope. CMJ brings to us the possible truths that the authodox does not want us to know or understand. Light and power from insight and truth seeking. Brilliant as ever.
Feb 20, 2022·edited Feb 20, 2022Liked by Chris Masterjohn, PhD
I can only contribute with my own personal experience of the five close members of my family who all met up for a long three day weekend recently. We shared a cottage, meals, pubs and restuarants, even a car: so plenty of chances to get infected.
Both of the 3x vaccinated - who happen to be the younger, fitter people in the family - 32 and 31 years old - subsequently tested positive and became unwell: the other three of us (two older aged 68 and 70, and one immuno-compromised disabled adult aged 27) are unvaxxed and tested negative for the following week: we are fine.
Sorry this doesnt fit the above narrative!
However,to be even handed, it is possible that the three of us were exposed to Covid in late 2019 and became infected then: in which case we may well carry antibodies.
I regret that it took so long for me to find this excellent article. It's a rare privilege to read such a balanced, thorough and thoughtful analysis. Thank you.
It was very difficult for me to read this. I have used PCR testing in environmental research since 2001. PCR was never designed to be used as a primary analytical tool to detect disease. It may confirm an infection in someone that already has symptoms. Also, the cycle thresholds used can force false positive or false negative. Both Covid-19 and the mRNA jabs are bioweapons via the "Spike Protein." Wake up people, the next wave of Covid will be designed to kill the vaccinated. So the more jabs you take the more you loose your immune system.
This is potentially the most important article I have read on the covid vaccines. Thanks a lot, Chris! I became a paid subscriber to your Substack.
Thanks Chris, I've been following your work since 2008. You're an inspiration. May I suggest that anyone fragile enough to die from the vaccine has already been removed from the potential pool of people to die from COVID and this gives an artificial reduction in deaths. Similar to your hypothesis in 2010 for The China Study, you don't die from COVID if you're already dead. Since a death less than 14 days after vaccination is counted as "unvaccinated" this data is hidden from the public. Providing the false appearance that the vaccine reduces mortality.
Great and in depth article Chris. It amazes me that the BMJ picked up the covid-like illnesses right at the beginning in the Pfizer trial, but like so many things it didn't get the attention it deserved. Good to see you on Substack!
A new section, "What Is PCR-Negative COVID-Like Illness?" with a new infographic has been added.
Thank you for helping us navigate such a confusing time. We sincerely appreciate your efforts!!!
Very nice article Chris. It actually answers the question that I asked myself, when I wrote an article based on CDC MMWR study from October, written in October:
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/shocking-antivax-numbers-from-the?utm_source=url
My question was why are the vaccinated having so much CLI that is not covid?
And I think that your answer is on the right track.
Excellent. "COVID-like illness" is a good term because it takes the nonsensical test (and indeed the nonsensical term COVID-19 itself) out of the equation and looks at actual symptoms instead.
This is such amazing work, and I haven't quite gotten to the end of it yet, but may I make a suggestion? In the sections where you analyze the fading efficacy against testing positive in Finland, New York, Israel, etc., consider contrasting it against "hospitalized positive tests" or "positive test hospitalizations" instead of "hospitalizations," just to remain consistent with the rest of the article, and its thesis that actual hospitalizations aren't reduced, but rather, only PCR-positive hospitalizations.
I'm sending you money to support this research. I think it would be very helpful for someone to create a graphic that looks like the ones hospitals were releasing all summer. But instead of having little people graphics representing, say, 10 hospitalized vaccinated people and 90 hospitalized unvaccinated people, all with covid, It will also have 90 hospitalized vaccinated people with covid-like illness who tested negative. And it needs to go viral. You need to send it, and this article, to all the usual juice skeptics with large audiences, but also to Matt Walsh, who can put it directly in front of Ben Shapiro, who is a huge juice fan, but is also very open to evidence. If you can get Shapiro talking about this, you've got an audience of millions, a large percentage of whom actually did get the juice.
I highly recommend interviewing ER doctors about this. I personally know one who would almost certainly be interested in talking to you, if you contact me. If your theory is correct, they should have been seeing juiced covid like illness in substantial numbers that coincided with each surge in the unfused over the past 12 months.
Dope. CMJ brings to us the possible truths that the authodox does not want us to know or understand. Light and power from insight and truth seeking. Brilliant as ever.
I can only contribute with my own personal experience of the five close members of my family who all met up for a long three day weekend recently. We shared a cottage, meals, pubs and restuarants, even a car: so plenty of chances to get infected.
Both of the 3x vaccinated - who happen to be the younger, fitter people in the family - 32 and 31 years old - subsequently tested positive and became unwell: the other three of us (two older aged 68 and 70, and one immuno-compromised disabled adult aged 27) are unvaxxed and tested negative for the following week: we are fine.
Sorry this doesnt fit the above narrative!
However,to be even handed, it is possible that the three of us were exposed to Covid in late 2019 and became infected then: in which case we may well carry antibodies.
Thank you Chris for all your efforts in education about the virus/vaccine predicament.
Thank you for writing this important piece. I hope many people read it.
I regret that it took so long for me to find this excellent article. It's a rare privilege to read such a balanced, thorough and thoughtful analysis. Thank you.
It was very difficult for me to read this. I have used PCR testing in environmental research since 2001. PCR was never designed to be used as a primary analytical tool to detect disease. It may confirm an infection in someone that already has symptoms. Also, the cycle thresholds used can force false positive or false negative. Both Covid-19 and the mRNA jabs are bioweapons via the "Spike Protein." Wake up people, the next wave of Covid will be designed to kill the vaccinated. So the more jabs you take the more you loose your immune system.
Why is this not all over the news? Oh yeah, Big Pharma owns them. Excellent article.