Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steve Finney.'s avatar

Excellent work Chris & it reminds me much of the warnings from Geneticist & RNA expert Alexandra Henrion-Caud which include reverse transcription. An experimental drug based on what appears to be limited studies & understanding of an extremely complex system, seems to beg the question - What could possibly go wrong ?

Expand full comment
John Smith's avatar

Chris, this is the best breakdown of this very concerning paper. Making the links to the lymph node study is also helpful to potentially find a common mechanism between the two studies - because WHY is the mRNA still being found so long after the initial injection? The fact that we don't have a clear answer to this, and why this is contrary to all the public health assurances that it'd be gone in a jiffy, is totally unconscionable. As you highlight, it's not like the estimations were off by mere hours or something. There is literally no other comparison of it lasting this long in the body. This should have been a serious pump the brakes moment if there were proper animal trials.

I also wonder if this can be tied into the negative effectiveness the data is showing regarding the vaccines, because multiple explanations are still being put forth as to why that's happening. (Extended production of an out of date epitope perhaps via this reverse transcription, or some kind of autoimmunity induced by the exosomes?). It's frighteningly bewildering as a layman, but crucially, as you state, "these questions should have been settled with well done experiments prior to ever having conducted human trials." EXACTLY! We shouldn't have to be playing detective AFTER this has already been given to hundreds of millions of people.

Anyway, thank you for the clear analysis and I am looking forward to the next posts regarding the spike protein toxicity.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts