Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ConsumnerDan's avatar

This is interesting, but I'm really concerned as I've been down so many protocol dead ends. I have done full DNA plus other testing, found a path to walk down with a protocol only to find either marginal temporary improvement or just a dead end. The cost is pretty high. I'm always optimistic, but feel very unsure I would find meaningful benefit and outcome...

Conrad S's avatar

Let's say someone did the Mitome test and then implemented the treatment strategies and made improvements. Would there be benefit from doing the Mitome test again in say, 6 months to 1 year, or some time frame?

I'm wondering if by improving "bottlenecks", do other bottlenecks show up?

Would 1 time of testing essentially give you what your signature bottlenecks are? Or, by opening up those bottlenecks, would other possible issues then become exposed? Could there then be a "next" bottleneck?

123 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?